Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
We reject the contention of defendant that County Court erred in denying his motion to exclude the testimony of all witnesses to the Ames Department Store incident as a sanction for a Rosario violation. While the People's failure to disclose before the suppression hearing police notes of those witnesses' interviews constitutes a Rosario violation (see, People v Malinsky,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.