1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 98 F.3d
  5. 98 F.3d 1206 (1996)
 

AMERICAN TEL. & TEL. v. UNITED COMPUTER SYSTEMS

Nos. 94-55565, 94-55567.

98 F.3d 1206 (1996)

AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, a New York corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellant. AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, a New York corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided October 30, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerrold J. Ganzfried, Howrey & Simon, Washington, DC (Jonathan S. Feld, Jeffrey S. Davis, Washington, DC, and Steven J. Stanwyck, Los Angeles, CA, on the briefs), for defendant-appellant-cross-appellee.

Jeffrey S. White, Orrick, Harrington & Sutcliffe, San Francisco, CA; Dan Marmalefsky, Hufstedler & Kaus, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant.

Before: REINHARDT, HALL, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

OPINION*

LEAVY, Circuit Judge:

North American Timeshare, Inc. ("NAT") appeals from the district court's calculation of prejudgment and postjudgment interest, and American Telephone and Telegraph Company ("AT & T") cross-appeals from the order of the district court confirming an arbitration award. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

On December 28, 1990, an arbitration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases