PROFESSIONAL GUARDIANSHIPS, INC. v. RUTH E. J.

No. 95-2010.

196 Wis.2d 794 (1995)

540 N.W.2d 213

IN the MATTER OF the GUARDIANSHIP OF RUTH E. J.: PROFESSIONAL GUARDIANSHIPS, INC., Petitioner-Appellant, v. RUTH E.J., Respondent-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided September 6, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of petitioner-appellant, the cause was submitted on the brief of Steven L. Miller of Miller & Miller of Green Bay.

Before Cane, P.J., LaRocque and Myse, JJ.


LaROCQUE, J.

Ruth E. J.'s guardian appeals the dismissal of a motion seeking an order permitting Ruth's doctors to perform electroconvulsive treatment (ECT) on her. The circuit court dismissed the motion because Ruth is incompetent and could not give consent to ECT as required by § 51.61(1)(k), STATS.1 In a summary order pursuant to an accelerated appeal, we reversed the circuit court on the grounds that § 51.61(1)(k), as applied...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases