1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 70 F.3d
  5. 70 F.3d 367 (1995)
 

DAVIS v. BAYLESS

No. 94-20552.

70 F.3d 367 (1995)

Lana Ryan DAVIS and Lori Davis, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Bobbie G. BAYLESS, Bayless & Stokes and Burta Rhodes Raborn, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

November 22, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George M. Bishop, Houston, TX, for Appellants.

Bobbie G. Bayless, Bayless & Stokes, Houston, TX, for Appellees.

Before LAY, DUHÉ and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

DeMOSS, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs Lana and Lori Davis appeal from rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of their complaint alleging claims for damages under federal and state law and seeking preliminary injunctive relief. Review of rule 12(b)(6) dismissal is de novo and dismissal should not be affirmed unless it appears that plaintiffs can prove no set of facts in support of their claims that would entitle them to relief. Blackburn v. City of Marshall,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases