1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 141 N.J.
  5. 141 N.J. 16 (1995)
 

YOUNG v. SCHERING CORP.

141 N.J. 16 (1995)

660 A.2d 1153

DR. WILLIAM B. YOUNG, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SCHERING CORPORATION AND DR. EDWIN S. BROKKEN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 11, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerrold J. Wohlgemuth argued the cause for appellants (Apruzzese, McDermott, Mastro & Murphy, attorneys).

Arnold S. Cohen argued the cause for respondent (Balk, Oxfeld, Mandell and Cohen, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by COLEMAN, J.

This wrongful termination of employment case requires us to determine the scope of the waiver provision of the New Jersey Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA), N.J.S.A. 34:19-8. The Appellate Division held that the statutory waiver does not preclude an employee from pursuing common-law claims that are sufficiently distinct from a CEPA claim. 275 N.J.Super. 221

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases