HEISLER v. TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP.

No. 93 Civ. 1770 (KMW).

884 F.Supp. 128 (1995)

Betty Ann HEISLER and John M. Heisler, Plaintiffs, v. TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

May 10, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Durst, Fuchsberg & Fuchsberg, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Denise O'Connor, O'Connor & O'Connor, White Plains, NY, for defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

KIMBA M. WOOD, District Judge.

Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation moves for summary judgment on the ground that choice of law principles compel the application of New Jersey law in this diversity action, and that, under New Jersey law, defendant is not liable to plaintiffs Betty Ann Heisler and John M. Heisler (together the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases