1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 18 F.3d
  5. 18 F.3d 955 (1994)
 

U.S. v. GENDRON

No. 92-2003.

18 F.3d 955 (1994)

UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Daniel A. GENDRON, Defendant, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Decided February 28, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan S. Sales, by Appointment of the Court, with whom The Law Office of William P. Homans, Jr., Cambridge, MA, was on brief, for appellant.

Robert E. Richardson, with whom A. John Pappalardo, United States Attorney, and James F. Lang, Assistant United States Attorney, Boston, MA, were on brief, for appellee.

Before BREYER, Chief Judge, BOUDIN, Circuit Judge, POLLAK, Senior District Judge.

BREYER, Chief Judge.

Daniel Gendron ordered and received a videotape that contained child pornography. Though he did not know it, the firm that sent him the tape was part of a law enforcement operation designed to catch child pornography buyers. A jury subsequently convicted Gendron of knowingly receiving child pornography through the mails. 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2). He now appeals that conviction, claiming that the child pornography statute is unconstitutional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases