1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 210 A.D.2d
  5. 210 A.D.2d 220 (1994)
 

WIND v. ELI LILLY & CO.

210 A.D.2d 220 (1994)

619 N.Y.S.2d 963

Janice Wind, Respondent, v. Eli Lilly & Company, Appellant, et al., Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

December 5, 1994

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

It is well settled that a settlement agreement is a contract subject to principles of contract interpretation and that where the intention of the parties is clearly and unambiguously set forth, effect must be given to the intent as indicated by the language used. Moreover, it is equally well settled that an ambiguity should not be found where none...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases