1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 25 F.3d
  5. 25 F.3d 229 (1994)
 

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM'N v. F.L.R.A.

Nos. 93-1704, 93-1851.

25 F.3d 229 (1994)

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, D.C., Petitioner, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent. National Treasury Employees Union, Intervenor. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, D.C., Respondent. National Treasury Employees Union, Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided June 3, 1994.

As Amended June 21, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Sushma Soni, Civ. Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for petitioner. Frederick Michael Herrera, Federal Labor Relations Authority, Washington, DC, for respondent. Timothy Brendan Hannapel, Asst. Counsel, National Treasury Employees Union, Washington, DC, for Intervenor. ON BRIEF: Frank W. Hunger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Mark B. Stern, Civ. Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for petitioner. David M. Smith, Sol., William R. Tobey, Deputy Sol., Federal Labor Relations Authority, Washington, DC, for respondent. Gregory O'Duden, Gen. Counsel, Barbara A. Atkin, Associate Gen. Counsel for appellate Litigation, National Treasury Employees Union, Washington, DC, for intervenor.

Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and ELLIS, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation.

Petition for review granted and application for enforcement denied by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which District Judge ELLIS joined. Judge MURNAGHAN wrote a separate dissenting opinion.

OPINION

NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge.

The question presented in this case is whether the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission can be compelled to negotiate with a union for proposals defining employee rights and procedures for investigatory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases