SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

Docket No. S026785.

4 Cal.4th 893 (1993)

844 P.2d 534

16 Cal. Rptr.2d 215

SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of California.

February 4, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

James K. Hahn, City Attorney, John F. Haggerty, Assistant City Attorney, and Henry G. Morris, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Appellant.

Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather & Geraldson and Michael Hickok for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Rutan & Tucker, John L. Fellows III and Carrie Phelan as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Respondents.


OPINION

MOSK, J.

We granted review in this matter to determine whether Penal Code section 594.1 (sometimes hereafter the statute), which mainly defines the lawful transfer and possession of aerosol paint and also requires retailers to post a warning against vandalism, preempts Los Angeles Municipal Code section 47.11 (sometimes hereafter the ordinance), which regulates the retail display...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases