1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 438 S.E.2d
  5. 438 S.E.2d 242 (1993)
 

LANGLEY v. PIERCE

No. 23956.

438 S.E.2d 242 (1993)

Wilbur M. LANGLEY and Marguerite L. Petersen, Personal Representative of the Estate of Frances F. Langley, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellants, v. Alan D. PIERCE, M.D., Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided November 8, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ellis I. Kahn and Justin S. Kahn, of Solomon, Kahn, Budman & Stricker, Charleston, for plaintiff-appellants.

James D. Brice and Edwin P. Martin, Jr., of Gibbes & Clarkson, PA, Greenville, for defendant-respondent.

CHANDLER, Justice:

Pursuant to Rule 228 SCACR, the following question has been certified from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit:

Was the Statute of Repose contained in S.C.Code Ann. § 15-3-545 (Supp.1992) tolled by S.C.Code Ann. § 15-3-30 (1976) when [the Defendant] Dr. Pierce moved from South Carolina in 1984?

FACTS

In 1979 and 1980, Defendant Dr. Pierce, a resident of South Carolina, removed two...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases