1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 18 Cal.App.4th
  5. 18 Cal.App.4th 644 (1993)
 

CARO v. PROCTER & GAMBLE CO.

Docket No. D016720.

18 Cal.App.4th 644 (1993)

22 Cal. Rptr.2d 419

STEPHEN J. CARO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

August 31, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, Specthrie & Lerach, William S. Lerach, Alan M. Mansfield, Darren J. Quinn, Kaitlin M. McCarty, Bushnell, Caplan & Fielding, Alan M. Caplan, Gary J. Near, Philip Neumark and Jonathan D. McCue for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Mitchell, Keeney & Waite, Thomas R. Mitchell, Todd F. Stevens, Dinsmore & Shohl, Thomas S. Calder and Joseph E. Conley, Jr., for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

KREMER, P.J.

Plaintiff Stephen J. Caro appeals an order denying his motion for class certification of his lawsuit against defendants The Procter & Gamble Company (P&G), N.W. Ayer, Inc. (Ayer), and The Vons Companies, Inc. (Vons). Caro contends in denying class certification the superior court applied improper legal criteria, impermissibly weighed the lawsuit's merits, and made unsupported findings about the atypicality...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases