1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 133 N.J.
  5. 133 N.J. 182 (1993)
 

RAWLINGS v. POLICE DEPT. OF JERSEY CITY

133 N.J. 182 (1993)

627 A.2d 602

WILLIE H. RAWLINGS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. POLICE DEPARTMENT OF JERSEY CITY, NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 13, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Emanuel S. Fish argued the cause for appellant (Fish, Field, Olesnycky & Livingston, attorneys; Stacy I. Benson, on the brief).

Carol Zylbert, Assistant Corporation Counsel, argued the cause for respondent (Paul W. Mackey, Acting Corporation Counsel, attorney).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by POLLOCK, J.

This case presents the issue whether defendant, Police Department of Jersey City (the department), violated the rights of plaintiff, Willie H. Rawlings, a police officer, under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution by directing him to submit a urine sample for mandatory drug testing. The department directed him to provide the sample pursuant to a departmental order that required officers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases