1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 68 Ohio
  5. 68 Ohio St.3d 82 (1993)
 

BRINKMAN v. ROSS

No. 92-1909.

68 Ohio St.3d 82 (1993)

BRINKMAN ET AL., APPELLEES, v. ROSS ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 29, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John S. Kuhn, for appellees.

John C. Nemeth and David A. Caborn, for appellants.

Murray & Murray, L.P.A., John T. Murray and Alicia Wolph, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers.

Isaac, Brant, Ledman & Teetor, Charles E. Brant, Steven G. LaForce and Barbara L. Kozar, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Association of Civil Trial Attorneys.

DOUGLAS, J.

In Ohio, it is well established that an owner or occupier of land ordinarily owes no duty to business invitees to remove natural accumulations of ice and snow from the private sidewalks on the premises, or to warn the invitee of the dangers associated with such natural accumulations of ice and snow. In Debie v. Cochran Pharmacy-Berwick, Inc. (1967), 11 Ohio St.2d 38, 40 O.O.2d 52, 227 N.E.2d 603, paragraphs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases