1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 862 S.W.2d
  5. 862 S.W.2d 325 (1993)
 

STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO. v. MATTOX

Nos. 92-SC-577-DG, 92-SC-581-DG.

862 S.W.2d 325 (1993)

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Sonya MATTOX, Appellee. and STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Joseph T. THOMAS, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

September 30, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martha L. Brown, Farmer and Kelley, London, Lee E. Sitlinger, Sitlinger, McGlincy, Steiner & Theiler, Louisville, for appellants.

Richard Hay, Somerset, for appellee, Mattox.

Grover S. Cox, Louisville, for appellee, Thomas.

LAMBERT, Justice.

The issue here is whether separately purchased items of added reparation benefits may be aggregated despite a policy provision by which such is prohibited. Our decision in these cases is not written on a clean slate. We have heretofore considered issues of stacking in Allstate v. Dicke, Ky., 862 S.W.2d 327 (1993), Hamilton v. Allstate Ins. Co., Ky., 789 S.W.2d 751

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases