1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 119 Wn.2d
  5. 119 Wn.2d 357 (1992)
 

BOHN v. CODY

No. 57579-7.

119 Wn.2d 357 (1992)

832 P.2d 71

LANDIS BOHN, ET AL, Petitioners, v. GEORGE CODY, ET AL, Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

As amended by order June 22, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard D. Wurdeman and Wurdeman & Tesch, P.C.; Philip A. Talmadge and Bernard H. Friedman of Talmadge Friedman & Cutler, for petitioners.

Eugene H. Knapp, Jr., Karen E. Vedder, and Lane Powell Spears Lubersky, for respondents.

[As amended by order of the Supreme Court June 22, 1992.]

JOHNSON, J.

Lucille and Landis Bohn loaned money to their daughter after discussing aspects of the proposed loan with their daughter's attorney. After their daughter failed to repay the loan, the Bohns sued the attorney. The attorney moved for summary judgment on the theory that he owed no duty of care to the Bohns, because the Bohns were neither his clients...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases