STATE v. BUNTING

91-01-95164; CA A68501.

826 P.2d 1060 (1992)

112 Or.App. 143

In the matter of Steve Bunting, Alleged to Be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Steve BUNTING, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 11, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. Ted Meece, Portland, argued the cause, for defendant. With him on the brief was Deich and Meece, Portland.

Janet A. Metcalf, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.


DURHAM, Judge.

Defendant appeals from an involuntary commitment order. ORS 426.307(6). The trial court found that defendant is a person who, because of a mental disorder, is unable to provide for his basic personal needs and is not receiving the care necessary for his health or safety. ORS 426.005(2)(b). He concedes that he has a mental disorder. We review de novo, State v. O'Neill, 274 Or. 59, 545...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases