1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 791 F.Supp.
  5. 791 F.Supp. 941 (1992)
 

ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS v. NEW HAVEN

No. 3:89-cv-00303 (PCD).

791 F.Supp. 941 (1992)

The ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF CONNECTICUT, et al. v. CITY OF NEW HAVEN.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

May 4, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael N. LaVelle, Pullman, Comley, Bridgeport, Conn., for plaintiffs.

Craig S. Tascher, Tarlow, Levy, Harding & Droney, Farmington, Conn., for intervenor B.T. Contractors.

Aileen M. Bell, W. Martyn Philpot, Jr., Corp. Counsel, New Haven, Conn., for defendant.

Jonel Newman, Ct. Civ. Liberties, Hartford, Conn., James W. Henderson, Jr., National Ass'n of Minority Contractors of Connecticut, Bloomfield, Conn., amicus briefs.

RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DORSEY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs seek a declaration that an ordinance which sets aside a percentage of city contracts for "disadvantaged and women business enterprises" is unconstitutional in light of City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469, 109 S.Ct. 706, 102 L.Ed.2d 854 (1989). Pending is plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment.1

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases