U.S. v. LILLY

No. 91-2192.

983 F.2d 300 (1992)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. William W. LILLY, Defendant, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Decided December 4, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morris M. Goldings with whom Richard S. Jacobs and Mahoney, Hawkes & Goldings, Boston, MA, were on brief, for defendant, appellant.

Richard E. Welch, III, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom A. John Pappalardo, U.S. Atty., and Stephen A. Higginson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Boston, MA, were on brief, for the U.S.

Before SELYA, CYR and BOUDIN, Circuit Judges.


SELYA, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal defendant-appellant William W. Lilly attacks his conviction on twenty-six counts of bank fraud. Lilly ranges his forces along three fronts. His first — and most substantial — assault raises a question of novel impression in this circuit concerning the bank fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1344 (1990).1 Lilly asseverates that the statute, as construed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases