KUTZIN v. PIRNIE


124 N.J. 500 (1991)

591 A.2d 932

MILTON KUTZIN AND RUTH KUTZIN, HUSBAND AND WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. DUNCAN PIRNIE AND GERTRUDE PIRNIE, HUSBAND AND WIFE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 27, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold Goldman argued the cause for appellants.

George Milanos argued the cause for respondents (Escala, Crabbe & Milanos, attorneys).


The opinion of the Court was delivered by CLIFFORD, J.

This is an action on a contract for the sale of residential property. The sellers' real-estate agent prepared the contract, after which defendants, the prospective buyers, signed it, paid a deposit of nearly ten percent of the purchase price, and then decided not to go through with the purchase. In the trial court the buyers argued that the contract had been rescinded because attorneys for both parties had sought...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases