1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 235 Cal.App.3d
  5. 235 Cal.App.3d 1730 (1991)
 

MUNOZ v. FLORENTINE GARDENS

Docket No. B050644.

235 Cal.App.3d 1730 (1991)

1 Cal. Rptr.2d 609

CAROLINA MUNOZ et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. FLORENTINE GARDENS, Defendent and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

November 20, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Judith S. Fogel for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Brown & DePiano and David M. Brown for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

JOHNSON, J.

(1) Plaintiffs purport to appeal from an order dismissing their case for failure to prosecute or as a sanction for failing to appear at the court-scheduled status conference. Such an order is not a final judgment and is not an appealable order. (Code Civ. Proc., § 581d;1 Rios v. Torvald Klaveness (1969) 2 Cal.App.3d 1077

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases