LAVERPOOL v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY

No. CV-90-2327 (ADS).

760 F.Supp. 1046 (1991)

Frederick B. LAVERPOOL, Sr., Gina Marsh, Ella Hill, Andrew Wilder, Percy Jackson, Jane Best-Simpson, John Doe, and Jane Doe, On Behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

March 30, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Vernon Mason, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Albert C. Cosenza, Gen. Counsel, by Evelyn Jonas, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Brooklyn, N.Y., for defendant New York City Transit Authority.


OPINION AND ORDER

SPATT, District Judge.

The plaintiffs, all former employees of the New York City Transit Authority ("TA"), challenge the TA's drug testing requirements, methodology and policy, and also its disciplinary procedures as discriminatorily directed against minorities. The Amended Complaint alleges six causes of action throughout this sixty-nine page pleading with 323 numbered paragraphs, and the plaintiffs refer to alleged violations of the Civil...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases