1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 214 Conn.
  5. 214 Conn. 407 (1990)
 

STAMFORD RIDGEWAY ASSOCIATES v. BOARD OF REPRESENTATIVES

(13805), (13806), (13807), (13808)

214 Conn. 407 (1990)

STAMFORD RIDGEWAY ASSOCIATES v. BOARD OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CITY OF STAMFORD EDWARD BENENSON v. BOARD OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CITY OF STAMFORD BULL'S HEAD MEDICAL ASSOCIATES v. BOARD OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CITY OF STAMFORD

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released April 3, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard C. Kaplan, with whom, on the brief, was Edward M. Kweskin, for the appellant (Stamford Ridgeway Associates and Edward Benenson).

Michael J. Cacace, with whom was Margaret Mary Pitt, for the appellants (Bull's Head Medical Associates and John Fiorito). Frank W. Murphy, with whom, was Barbara L. Coughlin, for the appellee (defendant in each case).

HEALEY, SHEA, GLASS, COVELLO and HULL, JS.

ARTHUR H. HEALEY, J.

The principal issue that we decide in these appeals is whether § C-552.21 of the Stamford charter permits the board of representatives to vote on separate zone changes contained in one zoning application or whether the board of representatives must act on the entire application. The trial court held that the board was required to act unitarily on the entire application and remanded the case to the board to sustain...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases