DANO v. COLLINS

No. 1 CA-CV 88-420.

166 Ariz. 322 (1990)

802 P.2d 1021

Franklin DANO, a single man, and Paul Huebl, a married man, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Tom COLLINS, in his capacity as Maricopa County Attorney; and Richard G. Godbehere, in his capacity as Maricopa County Sheriff, an agency of the State of Arizona, Defendants-Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

Reconsideration Denied May 9, 1990.

Review Granted January 15, 1991.

Review Denied April 16, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bill Stephens & Associates, P.C. by Bill Stephens, Katherine L. Mead, Phoenix, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Richard Romley, Maricopa County Atty. by Brian Ross Hauser, Deputy County Atty., Phoenix, for defendants-appellees.

Miller and Pitt by Denneen L. Peterson, Tucson, Robert Dowlut, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae Nat. Rifle Ass'n of America.


VOSS, Presiding Judge.

This case arises from the trial court's consideration of a declaratory judgment action which requested that A.R.S. § 13-3102(A)(1) and (2), which prohibits the carrying of concealed weapons, be declared unconstitutional as violating the Arizona Constitution art. 2, § 26. Appellees requested and were granted summary judgment. Because we find the statute constitutional, we affirm the trial court.

Article 2, § 26 of the Arizona...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases