U.S. v. CARROLL

No. 88-2260.

893 F.2d 1502 (1990)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William M. CARROLL, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided January 9, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Debold, argued, Office of the U.S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., for plaintiff-appellee.

Jill L. Price, argued, Federal Public Defenders Office, Detroit, Mich., for defendant-appellant.

Before KRUPANSKY and RYAN, Circuit Judges, and WILHOIT, District Judge.


RYAN, Circuit Judge.

This sentence guidelines appeal presents a meritorious assignment of error.

Because we conclude that the sentencing court erred as a matter of law in selecting the numerical value corresponding to the defendant's "role" in the offense in this case, and as a result necessarily came to a mistaken mathematical conclusion about the appropriate sentence guidelines range, we vacate the sentence and remand the case for resentencing.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases