1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 917 F.2d
  5. 917 F.2d 1413 (1990)
 

ARTHUR S. LANGENDERFER, INC. v. S.E. JOHNSON CO.

Nos. 87-3543, 87-3577, 87-3881, 87-3882, 88-3126, 88-3127, 88-3435, 88-3574 and 88-3651.

917 F.2d 1413 (1990)

ARTHUR S. LANGENDERFER, INC.; Northern Ohio Asphalt Paving Co.; MacRitchie Materials, Inc.; M & B Asphalt Co., Inc. and G.M. Sader Excavating & Paving, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants, v. S.E. JOHNSON CO.; Ohio Engineering Co.; Price Brothers, Inc.; Fred Creager & Sons, Inc.; Matco Asphaltic Concrete Products Co.; OAMCO; C.P. Calaway, Inc.; Maumee Stone Co.; Michigan Stone Co.; Wolcottville Sand & Gravel Corp.; Stoneco, Inc.; Saxton Development Co. and J.T. Kirby, Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided October 29, 1990.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied January 23, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James M. Porter, Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Walter J. Rekstis, Virginia A. Seger, Cleveland, Ohio, Thomas Zraik, Reiser & Zraik, Toledo, Ohio, for plaintiffs-appellants cross-appellees.

Thomas E. Kauper, Ann Arbor, Mich., John M. Curphey, Jack Zouhary, Robison, Curphey & O'Connell, Toledo, Ohio, M. Neal Rains, Paul H. Friedman, Irene C. Keyse-Walker, Arther & Hadden, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendants-appellees cross appellants.

Doreen C. Johnson, Columbus, Ohio, for amicus curiae, State of Ohio.

Before MARTIN and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges, and LIVELY, Senior Circuit Judge.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied January 23, 1991.

WELLFORD, Circuit Judge.

The parties in this antitrust controversy are, or were at one time, involved in businesses related to road and highway construction in northwestern Ohio. Plaintiff Arthur S. Langenderfer, Inc. (Langenderfer) was an asphalt paving contractor that ceased operations in 1978, allegedly due to defendants' antitrust violations. Northern Ohio Asphalt Paving Co. (NOAP), a sister company...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases