SAUNDERS v. LLOYD'S OF LONDON

No. 55902-3.

113 Wn.2d 330 (1989)

779 P.2d 249

LARRY G. SAUNDERS, Petitioner, v. LLOYD'S OF LONDON, ET AL, Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

September 21, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert L. Henry, for petitioner.

MacGillivray & Jones, P.S., by Richard E. Hayes and Susan Marie Gasch, for respondent Lloyd's of London.

Keefe & King, P.S., and John Hunt Whaley, for respondents Edwards.


UTTER, J.

The Court of Appeals affirmed the directed verdicts dismissing, for lack of evidence, petitioner Larry Saunders' suit to recover insurance proceeds. His policy stated that it terminated before the date the incident occurred. Saunders argues, however, that he presented sufficient evidence for jury consideration under theories of waiver, estoppel, and violation of the Consumer Protection Act. Under the facts of this case, we agree that the jury should have...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases