U.S. FOR USE AND BENEFIT OF WULFF v. CMA, INC.

No. 88-4207.

890 F.2d 1070 (1989)

UNITED STATES of America for the Use and Benefit of Robert WULFF and Caitlyn Wulff, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CMA, INC. and Reliance Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided November 27, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John L. Gannon, Boise, Idaho, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Howard W. Carsman, Stafford, Frey, Cooper & Stewart, Portland, Or., for defendants-appellees.

Before NORRIS, THOMPSON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.


DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:

Robert and Caitlyn Wulff (the "Wulffs") appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Reliance Insurance Company ("Reliance") dismissing the Wulffs' Miller Act suit filed under 40 U.S.C. § 270a. We affirm.

FACTS

CMA, Inc. ("CMA") as the prime contractor on a federal construction project for a Veterans Administration hospital in Boise, Idaho, supplied a payment bond written by Reliance Insurance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases