PERSONIS v. OILER

No. 53, Docket 89-7091.

889 F.2d 424 (1989)

George PERSONIS and Jean G. Personis, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Robert OILER and Douglas K. Abel Leasing, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided November 8, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Pertz, Utica, N.Y. (Julian & Pertz, Utica, N.Y., on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellants.

James R. Griffith, Utica, N.Y. (Felt, Hubbard & Bogan, Utica, N.Y., on the brief), for defendants-appellees.

Before FEINBERG and NEWMAN, Circuit Judges, and DUMBAULD, Senior District Judge.


JON O. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge:

A New York statute provides a procedure whereby a plaintiff may obtain a sixty-day extension of the applicable statute of limitations by delivering a summons to a designated official and having the summons served within sixty days after the expiration of the limitations period. N.Y.Civ.Prac.Law § 203(b)(5) (McKinney 1972 & Supp.1989). The issue in this case is whether section 203(b)(5) applies to a federal court diversity suit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases