WANGER v. G.A. GRAY CO.

No. 88-3444.

872 F.2d 142 (1989)

Lee E. WANGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. G.A. GRAY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided April 6, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul H. Tobias (argued), Tobias & Kraus, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Lee E. Wanger.

Robert W. Maxwell, II (argued), Keating, Muething & Klekamp, Cincinnati, Ohio, for G.A. Gray Co.

Before MILBURN and BOGGS, Circuit Judges, and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.


MILBURN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant Lee Wanger appeals from the summary judgment granted by the district court on April 18, 1988, and the subsequent amended summary judgment entered on May 2, 1988, in favor of defendant-appellee G.A. Gray Company ("Gray") which dismissed this action filed pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA" or "Act"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (1985). The issue before us is whether the district court erred in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases