1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 198 Cal.App.3d
  5. 198 Cal.App.3d 710 (1988)
 

SIDNEY v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. B029084.

198 Cal.App.3d 710 (1988)

244 Cal. Rptr. 31

ERIK NELSON SIDNEY, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; PAULINE H. KINOSHITA et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

February 17, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Meyer & Meyer and Timothy E. Meyer for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Julie Cloud Murry for Real Parties in Interest.

OPINION

THOMPSON, J.

(1a) In this case we hold that the statute of limitations does not bar amending a compulsory cross-complaint to state a cause of action against the plaintiff for a different injury arising from the same accident where the cause of action was not barred when the original complaint was filed. Petitioner Erik Sidney seeks a writ of mandate commanding respondent superior court to grant him leave to amend...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases