Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The prior consistent statement of the defendant's witness, offered by the defendant, was made after this witness had a motive to falsify, and thus it did not satisfy the criteria for admission into evidence to rebut any inference created by the prosecution that the witness's testimony was a recent fabrication (see, People v Davis,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
