RAM DITTA v. MD. NAT. CAPITAL PARK & PLANNING COM'N

No. 86-3836.

822 F.2d 456 (1987)

Debindra RAM DITTA, a minor by and through her father and next friend, Kesho RAM DITTA, and by and through her mother and next friend Rosabelle Ram Ditta, Appellants, v. MARYLAND NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided July 6, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard P. Horn (Oliver Denier Long, Long & Long, P.A., Bethesda, Md., on brief), for appellants.

Anthony M. Ventre, Asst. Co. Atty. (Paul A. McGuckian, Co. Atty., Joann Robertson, Associate Co. Atty., Rockville, Md., on brief), for appellee.

Before PHILLIPS and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and MERHIGE, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation.


SPROUSE, Circuit Judge:

Debindra Ram Ditta1 appeals from the district court's order dismissing her personal injury action against the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (Commission). The district court held that the Commission was a state agency and therefore immune from suit under the eleventh amendment of the United States Constitution. We reverse.

The Commission is a state-created entity charged with operating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases