BOUDREAU v. BAUGHMAN

No. 8721SC42.

356 S.E.2d 907 (1987)

Herbert Dean BOUDREAU v. Milo BAUGHMAN and Milo Baughman Design, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

June 16, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Faison, Brown, Fletcher and Brough by O. William Faison, Timothy C. Barber, and Jane T. Friedensen, Durham, for plaintiff-appellant.

Hutchins, Tyndall, Doughton and Moore by Richard Tyndall, H. Lee Davis, Jr., and Catherine C. Williamson, Winston-Salem, for defendants-appellees.


PARKER, Judge.

In this appeal, plaintiff assigns as error the trial court's order allowing defendant's motion to amend the answer as well as the court's denial of plaintiff's motion to reconsider this order. Plaintiff also assigns as error the trial court's order granting summary judgment for defendant. For the reasons that follow, we find no error and, therefore, affirm.

A threshold issue as to each of plaintiff's assignments of error is what law should govern...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases