PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his conviction for murder. He first contends that, because the state failed to provide timely discovery of evidence of blood tests that excluded other suspects, the trial court abused its discretion in admitting that evidence. ORS 135.805 to ORS 135.873. The evidence was not disclosed to defendant until trial, which was only one day after the state had acquired it. Defendant was not prejudiced by that delay. He twice thoroughly cross...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
