1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 178 Cal.App.3d
  5. 178 Cal.App.3d 653 (1986)
 

TAYLOR v. FIELDS

Docket No. B009873.

178 Cal.App.3d 653 (1986)

224 Cal. Rptr. 186

FLOSSIE TAYLOR, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JEAN B. FIELDS, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

March 11, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Marvin M. Mitchelson, Sat Karam Kaur Khalsa and Phillip I. Bronson for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Ervin, Cohen & Jessup and Horace N. Freedman for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

KLEIN, P.J.

Plaintiff and appellant Flossie Taylor (Taylor) appeals from the granting of a summary judgment in favor of defendant and respondent Jean B. Fields (Jean).

The papers in the summary judgment motion disclosed Leo D. Fields (Leo), a married man, and Taylor never lived together, and had a meretricious relationship. No existing case law supports a contract theory of recovery based on such a fact situation....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases