1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 22 Ohio
  5. 22 Ohio St. 3d 292 (1986)
 

STATE v. PLUMMER

No. 85-541.

22 Ohio St. 3d 292 (1986)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. PLUMMER, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 19, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald L. Rehm, for appellee.

Eric D. Ritz, for appellant.

CELEBREZZE, C.J.

In the case sub judice appellant contends that in order for a urinalysis test result to be admissible in a prosecution under R.C. 4511.19,1 the urine sample must be treated in compliance with the regulation set forth in the Ohio Adm. Code 3701-53-05(F). For the following reasons, we find that there has been substantial compliance with this regulation and affirm appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases