1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 783 F.2d
  5. 783 F.2d 1175 (1986)
 

WHITE v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.

No. 84-1743.

783 F.2d 1175 (1986)

Edith D. WHITE, Executrix of the Estate of Linwood Erle White, Jr., deceased; Edith Duffy White; James R. Revell, Sr., Administrator of the Estate of Charles E. Revell, Sr., deceased; Thelma Harts, Executrix of the Estate of Cephus Edward Roscoe, deceased, Appellees, v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC., a Connecticut corporation, Appellant, and Raymark Corporation, a Connecticut corporation; Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation; A Delaware corporation; Owens-Illinois Glass Company, an Ohio corporation; Nicolet, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation; Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation; The Celotex Corporation, a Delaware corporation; H.K. Porter Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation; Southern Textile Corporation, f/k/a Southern Asbestos Company, a Delaware corporation; Garlock, Inc., Precision Seal Division, an Ohio corporation; Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., an Ohio corporation; Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.; H.K. Porter Company, Inc., Thermoid Division, a Delaware corporation, Defendants.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided February 21, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James M. McCauley (William V. Hoyle, Charles A. Smith, Scott J. Varland, Hoyle, Corbett, Hubbard & Smith, Newport News, Va., on brief), for appellant.

Eugene Gressman, School of Law, University of N.C. Chapel Hill, N.C., for amicus curiae.

Before PHILLIPS, ERVIN and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

ERVIN, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal from the district court's order assessing juror costs in the amount of $2,000.00 against appellant Raymark Industries, Inc., pursuant to Local Rule 20(C) of the Federal Local Rules for the Eastern District of Virginia. Raymark challenges the validity and application of the local rule. Finding no merit in Raymark's arguments, we affirm the district court's order.

I.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases