1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 186 Cal.App.3d
  5. 186 Cal.App.3d 868 (1986)
 

GEBERT v. PATTERSON

Docket No. A033408.

186 Cal.App.3d 868 (1986)

231 Cal. Rptr. 150

STONY GEBERT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JAY PATTERSON, as Registrar of Voters, etc., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

October 28, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Arlo Hale Smith for Plaintiff and Appellant.

George Agnost, City Attorney, and Thomas J. Owen, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

ANDERSON, P.J.

The issue here presented for the first time in California is whether a local regulation which requires the proponent of a ballot argument to pay a fee before it is published in the voter's handbook is constitutional.

Stony Gebert (appellant) was the indigent proponent of the Marijuana Privacy Act Initiative (Prop. G) on the November 1985 ballot for the City and County of San Francisco. In August 1985...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases