CAESAR v. CHEM. BANK


66 N.Y.2d 698 (1985)

Neville F. Caesar, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Employees of Chemical Bank Similarly Situated, Respondent, v. Chemical Bank, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided October 17, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John B. Wynne, Robert T. Stephenson and Harold Weisblatt for appellant.

Alan R. Aledort for respondent.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and TITONE concur; Judge ALEXANDER taking no part.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified by granting defendant's motion for permission to proceed with pretrial disclosure and, as so modified, the order should be affirmed, with costs. The certified question is answered in the negative.

Neither oral nor implied consent is a complete defense to a privacy action under Civil Rights Law § 51 (Lomax v New Broadcasting Co.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases