1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 418 Mich.
  5. 418 Mich. 350 (1984)
 

TEBO v. HAVLIK

Docket Nos. 68033, 70881. (Calendar Nos. 10, 11).

418 Mich. 350 (1984)

343 N.W.2d 181

TEBO v. HAVLIK BURNS v. CARVER

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided February 6, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Smith, Bovill, Fisher, Meyer & Borchard, P.C. (by James T. Borchard and David B. Meyer), for plaintiffs Tebo.

Philip S. Della Santina for defendants Brimmer and Forbes.

Smith & Brooker, P.C. (by Michael J. Huffman, Thomas A. Connolly, and Robert A. Jarema), for defendant Denter.

Lopatin, Miller, Freedman, Bluestone, Erlich, Rosen & Bartnick (by Stephen G. Silverman and Richard E. Shaw) for plaintiff Burns.

Grenn & Grenn (by Frederick M. Grenn) for defendants Carver and Chase.

Amicus Curiae:

Ulanoff, Ross, Summer & Wesley, P.C. (by Stuart A. Ulanoff and Jerald R. Lovell), for Stonewall Insurance Company.

Decided February 6, 1984. Rehearing denied as to Tebo, 419 Mich. 1201.

BRICKLEY, J.

These cases involve the question whether this Court's decision in Putney v Haskins, 414 Mich. 181; 324 N.W.2d 729 (1982), interpreting the name and retain provision of the dramshop act, is to be given retroactive application.

In Burns, plaintiff filed her complaint on February...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases