BERRY v. PLAYBOY ENTERPRISES, INC.


195 N.J. Super. 520 (1984)

480 A.2d 941

CAROLYN AND LAWRENCE BERRY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. PLAYBOY ENTERPRISES, INC., AND PLAYBOY OF SUSSEX, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided August 15, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John G. Simmonds, for appellants.

Apruzzese & McDermott, for respondents (Charles F. Waskevich, Jr., on the brief).

Before Justice SULLIVAN, and Judges KING and BILDER.


The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, J.A.D.

This appeal presents the issue of whether an employer has a duty to explain with reasonable care an employee's options as to health and other supplemental benefits upon hiring. The appeal is taken from a summary judgment in favor of defendant Playboy Enterprises, Inc. The plaintiffs alleged that defendants' agents negligently misrepresented plaintiff Carolyn Berry's options for a health-benefit plan when she was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases