TORRES v. UNION PACIFIC R.R. CO.

Docket No. 66792.

157 Cal.App.3d 499 (1984)

203 Cal. Rptr. 825

PABLO S. TORRES, Plaintiff, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant; A.H. BOTTORFF COMPANY et al., Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

June 22, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Cummins & White, Joseph H. Cummins, Marshall W. Vorkink, Richard J. Wynne and James V. Shepherd for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant Union Pacific Railroad Company.

Anderson, McPharlin & Conners, Thomas J. Casamassima and Eric N. Winter for Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants A.H. Bottorff Company and J.C. Hallman Manufacturing Company.


OPINION

THOMPSON, Acting P.J.

This case calls upon us to define the term "good faith" as it is used in Code of Civil Procedure sections 877 and 877.6. Specifically, we must decide whether a settlement is in "good faith" when it is "too cheap," i.e., when it allows the settling codefendant to escape from the litigation without paying his fair share of the damages. We find that the standard...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases