GAMMON v. CLARK EQUIPMENT

No. 10754-2-I.

38 Wn. App. 274 (1984)

686 P.2d 1102

JUDY L. GAMMON, Individually and as Personal Representative, ET AL, Appellants, v. CLARK EQUIPMENT CO., ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

July 23, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James D. Burns, Burns, Schneiderman & Davis, Douglass A. North, and Hennings, Maltman, Webert & Reed, for appellants.

William R. Hickman, Robert C. Dickerson II, and Reed, McClure, Moceri & Thonn, for respondent Clark Equipment Co.

Philip A. Talmadge, Robert P. Piper, and Karr, Tuttle, Koch, Campbell, Mawer & Morrow, for respondent AA Rentals.


DURHAM, C.J.

Judy L. Gammon appeals from the denial of her motion for a new trial or judgment notwithstanding the verdict in connection with this wrongful death action. She raises several instructional, procedural and evidentiary errors, and also alleges that the jury's answers to the special interrogatories were inconsistent. We remand for a new trial as to respondent Clark Equipment Company only.

On October 13...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases