STANLEY v. MAGRATH

No. 83-1058.

719 F.2d 279 (1983)

Catherine M. STANLEY, Jeffrey A. Goldberg, Michael Douglas, and Christopher Ison, each individually and as Editors of The Minnesota Daily, The Minnesota Daily, and The Board of Student Publications, Appellants, v. C. Peter MAGRATH, individually and as President of the University of Minnesota, and Charles H. Casey, William B. Dosland, Erwin L. Goldfine, Lauris D. Krenik, Robert Latz, David M. Lebedoff, Charles F. McGuiggan, Wenda Moore, Lloyd H. Peterson, Mary T. Schertler, Neil C. Sherburne, Michael W. Unger, Verne Long, Willis Drake, and David Roe, each individually and as a member of the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided October 11, 1983.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied December 20, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tanick & Heins, Marshall H. Tanick, Samuel D. Heins, Minneapolis, Minn., for appellants.

Amy Silberberg, Legal Counsel, Minnesota Civil Liberties Union, Minneapolis, Minn., amicus curiae brief of The Minnesota Civil Liberties Union and The Associated Collegiate Press; Owen Gleason, Eden Prairie, Minn., of counsel; Steven Daily and Chris Kobin, MCLU Volunteer Law Students.

Leonard J. Keyes, Terence N. Doyle, Bruce W. Mooty, St. Paul, Minn., for appellees; Stephen S. Dunham, R. Joel Tierney, Minneapolis, Minn., of counsel.

Before LAY, Chief Judge, SWYGERT, Senior Circuit Judge, and ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.


Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied December 20, 1983.

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

At the end of the 1978-79 school year, the Minnesota Daily, the student newspaper of the Twin Cities campuses of the University of Minnesota, published an especially controversial issue. The Board of Regents, the governing body of the University, later changed the method of funding the newspaper. In the past, a compulsory fee had been exacted from every student to support...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases