TORRES v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA

No. 1 CA-IC 2860.

137 Ariz. 318 (1983)

670 P.2d 423

Andres TORRES, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, Bruce Church, Inc., Respondent Employer, Associated Indemnity Corporation, Respondent Carrier. Genaro PARRA, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, Bruce Church, Inc., Respondent Employer, Associated Indemnity Corporation, Respondent Carrier. Manuel HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, Bruce Church, Inc., Respondent Employer, Associated Indemnity Corporation, Respondent Carrier. Jesus FLORES, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, Bruce Church, Inc., Respondent Employer, Associated Indemnity Corporation, Respondent Carrier. Fausto R. NOVELO, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, Bruce Church, Inc., Respondent Employer, Associated Indemnity Corporation, Respondent Carrier.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C.

August 30, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cordova, Flores, Morales & Iniquez by Arnold Cordova, Jr., Phoenix, for petitioners.

James A. Overholt, Chief Counsel, The Industrial Com'n of Arizona, Phoenix, for respondent.

Jennings, Kepner & Haug by Carolyn Kaluzniacki, Craig R. Kepner, Phoenix, for respondents employer and carrier.


OPINION

JACOBSON, Chief Judge.

The sole issue raised by this review of an award of the Industrial Commission for a noncompensable claim in five consolidated cases is whether five workers injured while going to work in their own transportation were nevertheless in the course and scope of their employment because they were excluded from transportation supplied by the employer.

The claimants in this case were all employed as farm workers by Bruce Church...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases