1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 684 F.2d
  5. 684 F.2d 1316 (1982)
 

ANTI-MONOPOLY, INC. v. GENERAL MILLS FUN GROUP

No. 81-4281.

684 F.2d 1316 (1982)

ANTI-MONOPOLY, INC., Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. GENERAL MILLS FUN GROUP, INC., Defendant and Counter-Claimant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided August 26, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl E. Person, New York City, for Anti-Monopoly, Inc.

Robert S. Daggett, San Francisco, Cal., argued, for General Mills Fun Group, Inc.; Oliver P. Howes, Jr., Nims, Howes, Collison & Isner, New York City, Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, San Francisco, Cal., on brief.

Before DUNIWAY and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and TASHIMA, District Judge.

DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:

This is the second appeal in this case. Our first opinion is reported in Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. General Mills Fun Group, 9 Cir., 1979, 611 F.2d 296 (Anti-Monopoly I). On remand the district court again found that the "Monopoly" trademark was valid and had been infringed by Anti-Monopoly, Inc. Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. General Mills Fun Group, Inc.,<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases