BETASEED, INC. v. U AND I INC.

Nos. 80-3490, 80-3514.

681 F.2d 1203 (1982)

BETASEED, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U AND I INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee. U AND I INCORPORATED, Counterclaimant, Cross-Appellant, v. BETASEED, INC., Washington Sugar Beet Growers Association, the members and affiliates of the Washington Sugar Beet Growers Association, Does 1 to 1500, inclusive, Counterclaim-Defendants, Cross-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided July 23, 1982.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied September 16, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter S. Hendrixson, Dorsey, Windhorst, Hannaford, Whitney & Halladay, Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiff-appellant.

Michael H. Salinsky, Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, San Francisco, Cal., for U and I Inc.; Parker A. Maddux, San Francisco, Cal., on brief.

Before KILKENNY, ANDERSON and ALARCON, Circuit Judges.


Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied September 16, 1982.

ALARCON, Circuit Judge:

These appeals present, in the context of a private antitrust lawsuit, the familiar issue of whether the district court properly granted the parties' respective motions for summary judgment. In its complaint, Betaseed, Inc., alleges that U & I Inc. violated the Sherman Act's proscription against tying arrangements, reciprocal dealings, and monopolization. 15 U.S.C. §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases