1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 136 Cal.App.3d
  5. 136 Cal.App.3d 1009 (1982)
 

BELL v. HUMMEL

Docket No. 61290.

136 Cal.App.3d 1009 (1982)

186 Cal. Rptr. 688

GROVER CLEVELAND BELL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JAMES E. HUMMEL et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

October 26, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Lewis Metzinger & Associates for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Lewis, D'Amato, Brisbois & Bisgaard, R. Gaylord Smith and Nancy N. Potter for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

O'BRIEN, J.*

This is an appeal from the March 19, 1980, order dismissing the action as to defendants James E. Hummel, Robert W. Nowack, and Nowack & Hummel (respondents).1 The order followed the sustaining of said defendants' demurrer, without leave to amend, to the second amended complaint for legal malpractice.

FACTS

Plaintiffs Grover Cleveland...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases