1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 608 P.2d
  5. 608 P.2d 566 (1980)
 

SUMNER v. BENNETT

No. 107249; CA 13559.

608 P.2d 566 (1980)

45 Or.App. 275

Jack SUMNER, Appellant-Cross-Respondent, v. Chuck BENNETT, Respondent-Cross-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 17, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marc D. Blackman, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant-cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was Ransom, Rogers & Blackman, Portland.

David A. Rhoten, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent-cross-appellant. With him on the brief was Rhoten, Rhoten & Speerstra, Salem.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and GILLETTE and CAMPBELL, JJ.

GILLETTE, Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action pursuant to ORS 260.532,1 the Oregon Corrupt Practices Act. He sought general and punitive damages for alleged false statements made by the defendant during the 1978 primary election campaign for the Democratic nomination for a seat in the Oregon House of Representatives. He also sought to have the defendant deprived of the nomination and the nomination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases